LLM Leaderboard & AI Model Rankings
One page that aggregates the major AI benchmarks and leaderboards — Chatbot Arena Elo (arena.ai), the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index and speech arenas, and OpenRouter usage — across chat, coding, TTS, speech-to-text, image, video and agents.
| Rank | Model | Vendor | Speech Arena Elo ? |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Eleven v4 Turbo | ElevenLabs | 1330 ±18 |
| 2 | Eleven v4 | ElevenLabs | 1326 ±17 |
| 3 | Qwen-Audio-3.1-TTS-Plus | Alibaba | 1298 ±17 |
| 4 | Sonic 3.6 | Cartesia | 1286 ±15 |
| 5 | Gemini 3.8 Flash TTS | 1274 ±15 | |
| 6 | Qwen-Audio-3.0-TTS-Plus | Alibaba | 1267 ±15 |
| 7 | Realtime TTS-2 | Inworld | 1260 ±16 |
| 8 | Gemini 3.8 Flash-Lite TTS | 1246 ±14 | |
| 9 | Simba 3.2 | SpeechifyAI | 1244 ±13 |
| 10 | Breeze TTS 2 | BreezeBlue | 1223 ±15 |
| 11 | Realtime TTS-2 Flash | Inworld | 1219 ±14 |
| 12 | Luna TTS | VUI Labs | 1218 ±12 |
| 13 | Gemini 3.1 Flash TTS | 1214 ±11 | |
| 14 | StepAudio 2.5 TTS (Aug 2026) | StepFun | 1213 ±15 |
| 15 | v3 Conversational | ElevenLabs | 1210 ±14 |
| 16 | Sonic 3.5 | Cartesia | 1193 ±12 |
| 17 | Soniox TTS Real-Time v2 | Soniox | 1180 ±11 |
| 18 | Eleven v3 | ElevenLabs | 1177 ±11 |
| 19 | Speech 2.8 HD | MiniMax | 1174 ±11 |
| 20 | Gradium TTS (Sep 2026) | Gradium | 1173 ±14 |
| 21 | Lightning V3.1 Pro (Jul 2026) | Smallest.ai | 1172 ±13 |
| 22 | Falcon 2 | Murf AI | 1155 ±13 |
| 23 | Gradium TTS (Aug 2026) | Gradium | 1153 ±13 |
| 24 | Speech 2.8 Turbo | MiniMax | 1153 ±11 |
| 25 | SpaceXAI TTS | SpaceXAI | 1145 ±14 |
| 26 | Fish Audio S2.1 Pro | Fish Audio | 1143 ±12 |
| 27 | Step TTS 2 (Mar 2026) | StepFun | 1139 ±12 |
| 28 | Async Flash v1.5 | async | 1138 ±12 |
| 29 | Azure HD 2.5 | Microsoft | 1134 ±12 |
| 30 | Speech 2.6 HD | MiniMax | 1129 ±11 |
| 31 | Async Pro v1.0 | async | 1125 ±12 |
| 32 | Simba 3.0 | SpeechifyAI | 1125 ±12 |
| 33 | Speech 2.6 Turbo | MiniMax | 1124 ±11 |
| 34 | Fish Audio S2 Pro | Fish Audio | 1116 ±12 |
| 35 | Speech-02-HD | MiniMax | 1113 ±11 |
| 36 | TTS-1 HD | OpenAI | 1106 ±11 |
| 37 | Chatterbox HD | Resemble AI | 1104 ±12 |
| 38 | Speech 2.6 | Hithink | 1100 ±13 |
| 39 | Turbo v2.5 | ElevenLabs | 1100 ±10 |
| 40 | Step Audio EditX (Mar 2026) | StepFun | 1098 ±12 |
| 41 | Multilingual v2 | ElevenLabs | 1096 ±10 |
| 42 | Speech-02-Turbo | MiniMax | 1091 ±11 |
| 43 | TTS-1 | OpenAI | 1090 ±11 |
| 44 | Voxtral TTS | Mistral | 1088 ±12 |
| 45 | Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite TTS | 1085 ±12 | |
| 46 | OpenAudio S1 | Fish Audio | 1083 ±11 |
| 47 | Studio | 1081 ±11 | |
| 48 | GPT-Realtime-2 | OpenAI | 1079 ±13 |
| 49 | Flash v2.5 | ElevenLabs | 1078 ±11 |
| 50 | Journey | 1075 ±13 | |
| 51 | T2A-01-HD | MiniMax | 1068 ±11 |
| 52 | Maya 2 Flash | Maya Research | 1067 ±13 |
| 53 | Polly Generative | Amazon | 1066 ±12 |
| 54 | Magpie-Multilingual 357M (Feb 2026) | NVIDIA | 1063 ±12 |
| 55 | Kokoro 82M v1.0 | Kokoro | 1063 ±11 |
| 56 | Chirp 3: HD | 1060 ±12 | |
| 57 | Gemini 2.5 Flash TTS (Dec 2025) | 1060 ±12 | |
| 58 | Sonic 3 | Cartesia | 1060 ±12 |
| 59 | Coda | Rime | 1059 ±12 |
| 60 | MiMo-V2.5-TTS | Xiaomi | 1056 ±13 |
| 61 | Flux TTS | Deepgram | 1053 ±14 |
| 62 | Octave 2 | Hume AI | 1052 ±12 |
| 63 | Async Flash v1.0 | async | 1050 ±11 |
| 64 | Maya1 | Maya Research | 1047 ±12 |
| 65 | Maya 2 Global | Maya Research | 1046 ±14 |
| 66 | OpenAudio S1 Mini | Fish Audio | 1045 ±20 |
| 67 | Octave TTS | Hume AI | 1041 ±11 |
| 68 | Higgs Audio V3 TTS | Boson AI | 1038 ±13 |
| 69 | Bland Speech v3 | Bland AI | 1037 ±13 |
| 70 | Azure Neural | Microsoft | 1036 ±19 |
| 71 | Gemini 2.5 Pro (Dec 2025) | 1033 ±13 | |
| 72 | MAI-Voice-1 | Microsoft | 1033 ±12 |
| 73 | Polly Long-Form | Amazon | 1030 ±13 |
| 74 | T2A-01-Turbo | MiniMax | 1029 ±11 |
| 75 | Chatterbox | Resemble AI | 1027 ±11 |
| 76 | Lightning v3.1 | Smallest.ai | 1025 ±13 |
| 77 | MiMo-V2-TTS | Xiaomi | 1024 ±13 |
| 78 | Raon SpeechLM | Krafton | 1004 ±13 |
| 79 | Zonos-v0.1 | Zyphra | 1000 ±0 |
| 80 | Murf Speech Gen 2 | Murf AI | 986 ±12 |
| 81 | VibeVoice 1.5B | Microsoft | 957 ±14 |
| 82 | OpenVoice v2 | OpenVoice | 955 ±13 |
| 83 | Qwen3 TTS Flash | Alibaba | 943 ±14 |
| 84 | Neuphonic TTS | Neuphonic | 942 ±14 |
| 85 | Kugel 3 | KugelAudio | 935 ±13 |
| 86 | Qwen3 TTS | Alibaba | 932 ±13 |
| 87 | WaveNet | 918 ±12 | |
| 88 | XTTS v2 | Coqui | 916 ±15 |
| 89 | Mist V2 | Rime | 908 ±15 |
| 90 | Polly Neural | Amazon | 896 ±14 |
| 91 | Neural2 | 895 ±12 | |
| 92 | StyleTTS 2 | StyleTTS | 895 ±15 |
| 93 | Standard | 888 ±12 | |
| 94 | Noiz TTS | Noiz | 879 ±15 |
| 95 | MetaVoice v1 | MetaVoice | 848 ±18 |
| 96 | Polly Standard | Amazon | 832 ±16 |
Source: Artificial Analysis · Updated Oct 13, 2026 · PandaNpc Updated Oct 13, 2026, 06:00 UTCView full leaderboard →
How to read these numbers
An LLM leaderboard tells you which model people prefer; an AI benchmark tells you what a model can objectively do; usage data tells you what developers actually ship. No single ranking answers "which is the best AI model", so this page aggregates all three — Chatbot Arena Elo from arena.ai, the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index and speech arenas, and OpenRouter token share — and refreshes them daily.
arena.ai (formerly LMArena) shows users two anonymous answers to the same prompt and asks them to pick one, then derives an Elo rating from those battles. It measures which answer people prefer — not objective capability. A likeable style can win, while a rigorous but verbose answer can lose.
Votes are the battles a model has accumulated. A newly listed model has few votes and a wide confidence interval, so its rank swings easily — always read the rank together with the ± interval.
The Agent board works differently from the rest: it measures real agent sessions rather than blind-vote preference. Its headline metric, Net Improvement, is a percentage gain — not an Elo rating — so it cannot be compared across boards. arena.ai also reports five more dimensions (Confirmed Success, Steerability, Bash Recovery and others) on the full leaderboard.
The usage board comes from OpenRouter and counts real API token share — developers voting with their wallets, which complements the subjective preference boards.
The speech boards come from Artificial Analysis: TTS uses blind-listening Speech Arena Elo; ASR uses AA-WER v2, where lower is better; and native Speech-to-Speech uses an equal-weight composite of Big Bench Audio, Full Duplex Bench and τ-Voice, where higher is better. Compare scores only within the same board. Source: artificialanalysis.ai.
The Intelligence Index board comes from Artificial Analysis: it distills many public benchmarks into a single 0-100 Intelligence Index, measuring objective capability rather than subjective preference — a natural complement to arena.ai's human blind vote. Source: artificialanalysis.ai.